ITALY

In what areas does Italy
have a relative need for
or strong capacity for reform?
Key findings: Status
Help
Blue line represents country’s status performance on a scale from 1 (lowest) to 10 (best). White line is OECD average. Grey area shows variation within OECD. Click category titles for criteria performance and key findings.
At rank 26, Italy's status performance is rather poor. Labor policy is anemic, taxes high, and regulation burdensome. Tax evasion is high, and corruption remains a serious problem.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
OECD spread
Italy's democratic institutions are marred by persistent flaws.

While the basic electoral process is fair, private media companies are heavily biased toward the center-right parties. Public broadcasters depend on the parliamentary majority.

Civil rights are formally guaranteed, but undermined by an ineffective judiciary, police violence, and discrimination against migrants, minorities, and women.

Corruption is widespread, and courts slow.
Italy's economy has strengthened in recent years, but improvements are precarious.

Unemployment rates have crept downward, but the country lacks a coherent labor policy. Businesses face high taxes, considerable red tape, and subsidies allocated inefficiently by means of lobbying.

Tax evasion is widespread, and the black market large. The nation's public debt is very high.
Poverty rates are high in Italy, particularly in the south. Social welfare measures are generous, but poorly targeted.

The national health system is universal and comprehensive, but public health care quality is not always exemplary.

Family policy is minimal. Child care is expensive, with little support for working mothers. Many families give up having children.

Pension policy is skewed toward the current generation, and is in need of major reform.
Italy spends relatively little on its conventional military, relying on EU and NATO membership as protection against external security threats.

Organized crime is a problem in southern Italy, but less so in the north. Human and drug trafficking are serious issues.

Integration policy has largely been aimed at avoiding illegal immigration. Some minimal efforts have recently focused on integration.
Issues of sustainability have proved troublesome in Italy.

Environmental policy has not been a core priority, with serious waste and pollution issues in the south.

R&D spending is considerably below the OECD average, and often inefficiently allocated.

Schools are underfunded, and educational achievement is relatively low.
Key findings: Management
Help
Blue line represents country’s management performance on a scale from 1 (lowest) to 10 (best). White line is OECD average. Grey area shows variation within OECD. Click category titles for criteria performance and key findings.
At rank 26, Italy's management performance is below average. Although participating actively in international coalitions, leadership at home lacks effective strategic planning or capacity for institutional reform.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.
OECD spread
Long-term strategic planning is difficult in Italy. Government majorities are fragmented, and ministers' loyalties are often directed to their individual parties.

The prime minister's office is often reactive, engaging when problems arise in the policy-making process.

RIAs are formally required, but not systematically implemented. However, the government often consults groups (in particular trade unions) on matters of particular importance.

Italian governments are particularly unable to enforce consistent communication across administrations.
The government's ability to win legislative approval for its agenda varies across administrations, with larger majorities increasing efficiency.

The two legislative chambers have equal power, leading more often to delaying tactics rather than outright rejection.

The Supreme Court can and does overturn legislation as unconstitutional.
Italy's governments have proved open to international influence. European integration has proven to be of particular significance.

The country often participates in international reform initiatives, but acts often as a late follower rather than a leader.
Self-monitoring in Italy's political system is rather sporadic.

The government in power during the period under review proved somewhat overwhelmed by coalition problems.
Most Italians claim either little political interest, or an inability to understand the content of policy debates.

The legislature makes use of its oversight powers, but is hampered by government resistance.

Party platforms are more pragmatic than ideological. Interest groups can be influential, but their proposals tend to focus on their own short-term interests.
Governments in charge
Help
SGI 09 review period (January 2005 to March 2007) is outlined in black.

Shown are: Prime minister or president, type of government, and ruling parties. Asterisks indicate national parliamentary or presidential elections.
Contributors
Help
Country scores and texts were produced by the country coordinator, based on comprehensive assessments by three country experts. For the individual experts’ reports, see download page.
 
Country coordinator
Prof. Dr. Cesar Colino
Department of Political Science and Administration, Faculty of Political Science and Sociology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid

Country experts
Prof.Dr. Maurizio Cotta
Universita di Siena

Roman Maruhn
University of Munich

Marco Annunziata
UniCredit Markets & Investment Banking, Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG