INTEGRATION

Foreign-born tertiary attainment
Help
To ensure comparability, observed values are transformed into SGI scores on a scale from 1 to 10. The lowest value translates into score 1, the best value into score 10. Remaining values are transformed according to the original data distribution.
#
Value
Score
1Ireland41.1
10.00
 
2Canada38.0
9.06
 
3Mexico34.8
8.10
 
3UK34.8
8.10
 
5New Zealand31.0
6.95
 
6Norway30.5
6.80
 
7Japan30.0
6.65
 
8USA26.1
5.47
 
9Australia25.8
5.38
 
10Sweden24.3
4.93
 
11Denmark23.9
4.81
 
12Switzerland23.7
4.74
 
13Belgium23.0
4.53
 
14Chile22.7
4.44
 
14Iceland22.7
4.44
 
14South Korea22.7
4.44
 
17Luxembourg21.7
4.14
 
18Spain21.1
3.96
 
19Hungary19.8
3.57
 
20Portugal19.3
3.42
 
21Netherlands19.2
3.39
 
22Finland18.9
3.30
 
23France18.1
3.05
 
24Greece15.9
2.39
 
25Slovakia15.7
2.33
 
26Turkey15.2
2.18
 
27Germany14.9
2.09
 
28Czech Rep.12.8
1.45
 
29Italy12.2
1.27
 
30Poland11.9
1.18
 
31Austria11.3
1.00
 
10
Key concepts
 
Globalization has led to growing communities of immigrants even in traditionally homogeneous societies, many of which play a vital economic role in their adopted homes. Both the immigrants themselves and the broader communities benefit if these populations can be smoothly integrated into the surrounding society.

Integration-related policies comprise a wide array of cultural, educational and social policies which directly or indirectly affect the status of immigrant communities. The objective of integration is not forced assimilation, but does favor the acquisition of nationality.

Examining employment rates as well as educational attainment levels allows a broad, often multi-generational assessment of integration progress to be made.
Performance comparison
Help
Use drop-down menus for selections. In all cases, higher scores reflect better performance.
Please download the Flash-PlugIn.