Sitemap
Party competence
Following the SGI codebook, the country’s performance has been assessed on a scale from 1 to 10.
#
Score 2011
| 1 | Australia | 9 |
|
| 1 | Denmark | 9 |
|
| 1 | New Zealand | 9 |
|
| 1 | Norway | 9 |
|
| 1 | Sweden | 9 |
|
| 1 | UK | 9 |
|
| 7 | Belgium | 8 |
|
| 7 | Finland | 8 |
|
| 7 | Luxembourg | 8 |
|
| 7 | Netherlands | 8 |
|
| 7 | Spain | 8 |
|
| 7 | Switzerland | 8 |
|
| 13 | Austria | 7 |
|
| 13 | Canada | 7 |
|
| 13 | Chile | 7 |
|
| 13 | Czech Rep. | 7 |
|
| 13 | Germany | 7 |
|
| 13 | Ireland | 7 |
|
| 13 | Japan | 7 |
|
| 13 | USA | 7 |
|
| 21 | France | 6 |
|
| 21 | Iceland | 6 |
|
| 21 | Italy | 6 |
|
| 21 | Mexico | 6 |
|
| 21 | Portugal | 6 |
|
| 26 | Poland | 5 |
|
| 26 | Slovakia | 5 |
|
| 28 | Hungary | 4 |
|
| 28 | Turkey | 4 |
|
| 30 | Greece | 3 |
|
| 31 | South Korea | 2 |
10
Question
Do the major parties propose feasible
and coherent policies in their
electoral programs?
Indicator Design
Party competence: texts + scores are based on independent assessments by two experts. Results were adjusted for cross-national consistency by the regional coordinator and SGI board.
Download Scores
