| Metadata SGI 2011 |  |
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Calculation | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Metadata SGI 2009 | |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Calculation | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Sitemap
Gender equality
To ensure comparability, observed values are transformed into SGI scores on a scale from 1 to 10. The lowest value translates into score 1, the best value into score 10. Remaining values are transformed according to the original data distribution.
#
Value
Score 2011
| 1 | Sweden | 0.84 | 10.00 |
|
| 2 | Norway | 0.79 | 9.20 |
|
| 3 | Denmark | 0.74 | 8.39 |
|
| 4 | Australia | 0.73 | 8.23 |
|
| 4 | Iceland | 0.73 | 8.23 |
|
| 6 | Finland | 0.72 | 8.07 |
|
| 6 | New Zealand | 0.72 | 8.07 |
|
| 8 | UK | 0.70 | 7.75 |
|
| 9 | Hungary | 0.67 | 7.27 |
|
| 10 | Netherlands | 0.66 | 7.11 |
|
| 10 | Switzerland | 0.66 | 7.11 |
|
| 12 | Canada | 0.65 | 6.95 |
|
| 13 | USA | 0.64 | 6.79 |
|
| 14 | France | 0.62 | 6.46 |
|
| 15 | Germany | 0.61 | 6.30 |
|
| 15 | Portugal | 0.61 | 6.30 |
|
| 17 | Czech Rep. | 0.60 | 6.14 |
|
| 17 | Poland | 0.60 | 6.14 |
|
| 19 | Slovakia | 0.59 | 5.98 |
|
| 20 | Ireland | 0.58 | 5.82 |
|
| 21 | Luxembourg | 0.55 | 5.34 |
|
| 22 | Greece | 0.53 | 5.02 |
|
| 22 | Spain | 0.53 | 5.02 |
|
| 24 | Belgium | 0.52 | 4.86 |
|
| 24 | South Korea | 0.52 | 4.86 |
|
| 26 | Italy | 0.49 | 4.38 |
|
| 27 | Japan | 0.46 | 3.89 |
|
| 28 | Mexico | 0.42 | 3.25 |
|
| 29 | Chile | 0.41 | 3.09 |
|
| 30 | Austria | 0.40 | 2.93 |
|
| 31 | Turkey | 0.28 | 1.00 |
10
Question
What is the percentage of estimated
female-to-male earned income?
Indicator Design
Values reflect the percentage of estimated average female earned income to male earned income, in 2006. Source: OECD Gender, Institutions and Development Database 2009.
Download Scores
Metadata 2011
Year
Unit
Source
URL
Metadata 2009
Year
Unit
Source
URL