Sitemap
Corruption prevention
Following the SGI codebook, the country’s performance has been assessed on a scale from 1 to 10.
#
Score 2011
| 1 | New Zealand | 10 |
|
| 1 | Sweden | 10 |
|
| 3 | Canada | 9 |
|
| 3 | Denmark | 9 |
|
| 3 | Finland | 9 |
|
| 3 | Iceland | 9 |
|
| 3 | Switzerland | 9 |
|
| 3 | USA | 9 |
|
| 9 | Australia | 8 |
|
| 9 | Luxembourg | 8 |
|
| 9 | Norway | 8 |
|
| 12 | Austria | 7 |
|
| 12 | Belgium | 7 |
|
| 12 | Germany | 7 |
|
| 12 | Netherlands | 7 |
|
| 12 | UK | 7 |
|
| 17 | Chile | 6 |
|
| 17 | Ireland | 6 |
|
| 17 | Poland | 6 |
|
| 17 | Portugal | 6 |
|
| 17 | Spain | 6 |
|
| 22 | France | 5 |
|
| 22 | Japan | 5 |
|
| 22 | South Korea | 5 |
|
| 25 | Czech Rep. | 4 |
|
| 25 | Hungary | 4 |
|
| 25 | Turkey | 4 |
|
| 28 | Greece | 3 |
|
| 28 | Italy | 3 |
|
| 28 | Slovakia | 3 |
|
| 31 | Mexico | 2 |
10
Question
Are public officeholders prevented from abusing their position for private interests?
Indicator Design
Corruption prevention: texts + scores are based on independent assessments by two experts. Results were adjusted for cross-national consistency by the regional coordinator and SGI board.
Download Scores
