|
#
Hierarchy tree
Score 2011
|
| 4 | Status Index | 8.51 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 3 | Economy/Employment | 7.7 | ||
| 3 | Labor market | 8.6 | ||
| 5 | Long-term unemployment | 9.84 | ||
| 6 | Low-skilled unemployment | 9.65 | ||
| 1 | Labor market policy | 9 | ||
| 6 | Employment rate | 8.38 | ||
| 11 | Unemployment | 8.19 | ||
| 13 | Youth unemployment | 7.26 | ||
| 5 | Intensity of active LMP | 5.76 | ||
| 1 | Taxes | 8.1 | ||
| 1 | Tax evasion | 10.00 | ||
| 3 | Tax system complexity | 9.56 | ||
| 1 | Tax policy | 9 | ||
| 10 | Marginal tax burden (individuals) | 5.79 | ||
| 16 | Total tax rate | 5.78 | ||
| 14 | Marginal tax burden (businesses) | 4.75 | ||
| 6 | Budgets | 7.8 | ||
| 2 | Soundness of banks | 9.70 | ||
| 6 | Debt-to-GDP | 9.13 | ||
| 5 | Budgetary policy | 9 | ||
| 3 | Debt interest ratio | 8.00 | ||
| 13 | Net debt ratio | 5.05 | ||
| 11 | Budget consolidation | 1.00 | ||
| 3 | Enterprises | 7.1 | ||
| 2 | Enterprise regulation | 9.76 | ||
| 2 | Enterprise policy | 8 | ||
| 13 | Energy costs for enterprises | 6.26 | ||
| 12 | Unit labor costs | 5.78 | ||
| 8 | Corporate investment | 5.12 | ||
| 15 | Real interest rates | 4.21 | ||
| 11 | Economy | 7.1 | ||
| 4 | Economic policy | 8 | ||
| 14 | Product market regulation | 7.53 | ||
| 23 | Inflation | 7.50 | ||
| 15 | Competitiveness | 6.37 | ||
| 22 | GDP per capita | 3.12 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 2 | Social affairs | 8.2 | ||
| 6 | Families | 8.6 | ||
| 1 | Fertility rate | 10.00 | ||
| 6 | Child care density | 9.41 | ||
| 4 | Family policy | 9 | ||
| 6 | Spending on family policy | 8.26 | ||
| 21 | Child poverty | 5.10 | ||
| 2 | Pensions | 8.3 | ||
| 1 | Public pension coverage | 10.00 | ||
| 1 | Senior citizen poverty | 10.00 | ||
| 2 | Older employment | 8.51 | ||
| 8 | Pension policy | 8 | ||
| 7 | Dependency ratio | 6.03 | ||
| 1 | Integration | 8.2 | ||
| 1 | Integration policy | 9 | ||
| 3 | Foreign-born sec. attainment | 8.72 | ||
| 17 | Foreign-born unemployment | 7.19 | ||
| 5 | Foreign-born tert. attainment | 6.95 | ||
| 23 | Foreign-born-to-native empl. | 6.92 | ||
| 3 | Health care | 8.1 | ||
| 4 | Spending on pharmaceuticals | 9.33 | ||
| 27 | Private-to-public HC spending | 8.77 | ||
| 23 | Infant mortality | 8.16 | ||
| 5 | Health policy | 8 | ||
| 12 | Life expectancy-to-HC spending | 7.51 | ||
| 3 | Preventive HC spending | 7.04 | ||
| 8 | Social inclusion | 7.6 | ||
| 3 | Youth not in employ./education | 8.81 | ||
| 6 | Life satisfaction | 8.36 | ||
| 6 | Gender equality | 8.07 | ||
| 5 | Social inclusion policy | 8 | ||
| 23 | Gini coefficient | 6.70 | ||
| 17 | Poverty | 6.22 | ||
| 8 | Social/political participation | 4.93 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 2 | Security | 8.9 | ||
| 1 | External security | 9.5 | ||
| 1 | Relations with neighbors | 10.00 | ||
| 1 | Conflicts fought | 10.00 | ||
| 1 | External security policy | 9 | ||
| 9 | Internal security | 8.4 | ||
| 10 | Homicides | 9.32 | ||
| 1 | Internal security policy | 9 | ||
| 12 | Reliability of police services | 8.85 | ||
| 13 | Costs of crime | 7.33 | ||
| 29 | Burglaries and robberies | 5.35 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 7 | Resources | 6.5 | ||
| 4 | Education | 7.8 | ||
| 2 | Education policy | 9 | ||
| 4 | PISA results | 8.57 | ||
| 2 | Tertiary attainment | 8.25 | ||
| 17 | Upper sec. attainment | 6.47 | ||
| 18 | Pre-primary education | 5.53 | ||
| 11 | Continuing education | 4.54 | ||
| 12 | Environment | 6.2 | ||
| 8 | Waste management | 8.13 | ||
| 20 | Energy intensity | 8.03 | ||
| 12 | Environmental policy | 6 | ||
| 20 | CO2 emissions | 5.91 | ||
| 29 | Water usage | 5.23 | ||
| 3 | Energy mix | 4.60 | ||
| 15 | R&D | 5.6 | ||
| 10 | Research and innovation policy | 7 | ||
| 18 | Broadband internet access | 5.55 | ||
| 6 | Science degrees | 5.39 | ||
| 22 | Public R&D spending | 4.35 | ||
| 19 | Industry R&D personnel | 3.66 | ||
| 21 | Triad Patents | 2.00 | ||
|
10
|
||||
Management Index
To ensure comparability, observed values are transformed into scores on a scale from 1 to 10. The lowest value translates into score 1, the best value into score 10, and remaining values are transformed according to the original data distribution. | ||||
|
#
Hierarchy tree
Score 2011
|
| 5 | Management Index | 7.72 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 4 | Institutional learning | 8.0 | ||
| 4 | Reform capacity | 8.0 | ||
| 3 | Reform capacity | 8 | ||
| 4 | Self-monitoring | 8 | ||
| 5 | Adaptability | 8.0 | ||
| 2 | International coordination | 9 | ||
| 12 | Domestic adaptability | 7 | ||
|
10
|
||||
|
|
| 7 | Accountability | 7.3 | ||
| 10 | Oversight | 8.9 | ||
| 1 | Ombuds office | 10 | ||
| 1 | Audit office | 10 | ||
| 1 | Summoning experts | 10 | ||
| 5 | Non-majority leverage | 9.05 | ||
| 9 | Obtaining documents | 9 | ||
| 24 | Summoning ministers | 8 | ||
| 27 | Task area coincidence | 6 | ||
| 6 | Parties/Associations | 8.0 | ||
| 1 | Party competence | 9 | ||
| 5 | Assoc. competence (others) | 8 | ||
| 16 | Assoc. competence (business) | 7 | ||
| 7 | Citizens | 7.6 | ||
| 4 | Policy knowledge | 8 | ||
| 11 | Voter turnout | 7.18 | ||
| 13 | Legislature | 6.3 | ||
| 1 | Number of committees | 10.00 | ||
| 17 | Committee size | 8.88 | ||
| 24 | Pro-gvmt. committee chairs | 7.14 | ||
| 6 | Legislature’s research staff | 4.55 | ||
| 28 | Deputy expert staff | 1.00 | ||
| 9 | Media | 5.2 | ||
| 6 | Media reporting | 8 | ||
| 10 | Quality newspapers | 3.94 | ||
| 15 | Newspaper circulation | 3.59 | ||
|
10
|