Policy Performance


Economic Policies

Having fared well in both the crisis and post-crisis periods, Sweden holds the SGI 2019’s top position (rank 1) with respect to economic policies. Its score on this measure has improved by 0.4 points relative to 2014.

The country has been on a positive, stable economic-development track for years. Growth has been consistently robust. Interest rates have been lowered to sub-zero levels to fend off deflation, and housing-bubble fears are emerging. The economy remains strongly internationally competitive.

The unemployment rate is moderate by EU standards, at about 6%. The government has pledged to halve this by 2020. While large numbers of migrants were continuing to look for employment, the country has been successful in integrating a significant share of refugees into the labor market.

Tax levels are comparable with those of the country’s main economic competitors, with corporate taxes low from an international perspective. The economic boom of the last several years has led to a number of years of budgetary surplus. The country invests strongly in R&D, and is emerging as a global center of digital innovation.

Social Policies

With its highly developed welfare state, Sweden falls into the top ranks worldwide (rank 4) with regard to social policies. Its score on this measure has declined by 0.4 points since 2014.

A decline in students’ internationally comparative test rankings has been reversed, but the absolute level remains worryingly low. Debate over causes and solutions has been intense, and numerous reforms have been implemented. Levels of gender equality are high. Poverty and income inequality rates are low but increasing, and young people are having in finding jobs.

Recent health-care privatization has been associated with long wait times and reports of substandard treatments, though care quality is generally good. Family policies are generous, with extensive maternal and paternal leave and ample child-care provision.

Pension-system sustainability has improved. Government and opposition parties have agreed to increase the retirement age. Immigration policies are generous, but integration has proved problematic despite considerable policy commitment to the issue. Crime rates, while still at moderate levels, have become an increasing public concern.

Environmental Policies

With a longstanding focus on ecological issues, Sweden takes the SGI 2019’s top position (rank 1) in the area of environmental policy. Its score in this area has improved by 0.4 points relative to 2014.

The country remains a significant energy consumer, but greenhouse-gas emissions are declining, and the use of renewable energy resources is improving. It is not a leader in the areas of recycling or water usage.

The country’s use of nuclear energy remains a controversial question, but several reactors are slated to close in any case due to low profitability.

Sweden has historically given strong support to global environmental regimes, even going beyond the requirements of international accords such as the Kyoto Protocol and Paris accord.



Quality of Democracy

With its unmatched set of strengths, Sweden is the SGI 2019’s top overall scorer (rank 1) with regard to democracy quality. Its score on this measure is unchanged relative to its 2014 level.

Electoral processes are very well regulated. Political parties receive public and private funding, with new legislation substantially increasing the transparency of this financing. Media independence is well protected, and the sector is competitive, with online media gaining increasing importance.

Access to government information is broad, though delays have prompted criticism. Civil rights are firmly respected, and discrimination is not tolerated, though the influx of refugees is stressing the migration system. A debate has arisen over whether returning young refugees denied asylum to their country of origin is humane. Ethnic segmentation in metropolitan suburbs is increasing.

The rule of law is quite strong, and corruption is very rare, through reports of abuse at the local level have increased. The trend toward market-based administrative reforms appears to have peaked. Judicial review is active, and court appointments are strictly meritocratic. New protections for whistleblowers have been implemented.



Executive Capacity

With multiple layers of effective coordination, Sweden is the SGI 2019’s top scorer (rank 1) in the area of executive capacity. Its score on this measure has improved by 0.1 point relative to its 2014 level.

Strategic capacity has been enhanced in recent years, with planning efforts focused in the Finance Ministry. Considerable energy has been spent improving interdepartmental coordination, in part by centralizing authority in the government office and Finance Ministry. Policy details are developed at the nonpartisan bureaucratic level. Informal coordination plays an important role.

While RIAs are not used systematically, environmental-sustainability reviews are mandatory. Ex post performance measurement is common. Though institutionalized societal consultation has diminished in past years, the government has closely consulted with unions in particular. Efforts to increase communication coherency have led to complaints of declining access to members of the government.

Closely monitored agencies, rather than ministries, implement policies, and even have a say in policy development. Central state control over local governments has increased in recent years. Regulatory agencies often use incentives rather than formal rules to elicit behavior, but there is no evidence of systemic bias. Local taxes are increasing in some metropolitan areas to address refugee-related costs.

Executive Accountability

With mature oversight mechanisms, Sweden falls into the top ranks internationally (rank 2) with respect to executive accountability. Its score this year has improved by 0.1 point relative to its 2014 level.

The population has a strong interest in politics, and election turnout rates are very high. Media reporting of policy issues is generally good by international standards.

Parliamentarians have adequate resources, and well-developed executive-oversight powers. The audit office has recovered from crisis, and now delivers high-quality audits. Sweden effectively invented the ombudsman institution, and it remains influential. The data-protection agency handles complaints and conducts its own inquiries and inspections.

Political-party decision-making has gradually become more open. Economic-interest organizations are sophisticated, and have long been integrated into policymaking processes. The capacities of other interest organizations vary, but many are quite developed.
Back to Top